<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dungeoncraft: The Future of Asecia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stargazersworld.com/2008/10/28/dungeoncraft-the-future-of-asecia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stargazersworld.com/2008/10/28/dungeoncraft-the-future-of-asecia/</link>
	<description>A Role Playing Games Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyatt</title>
		<link>http://www.stargazersworld.com/2008/10/28/dungeoncraft-the-future-of-asecia/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stargazersworld.com/wordpress/?p=370#comment-375</guid>
		<description>When I made my setting, I basically made it with D&amp;D in mind from the start. After 3.5 proved too difficult to work with, I shifted all design intentions to entwine with D&amp;D 4e. Though I&#039;m sure the setting could work decently enough with generic rules sets too. However, I think the choice of system and whether or not it works is something for the individual. I don&#039;t really get it much.

For example, I am a big fan of abstract rules – my favorite RPGs are D&amp;D 4e, Maid: RPG and Lesbo Jet Fighters, all of which are pretty loose. I suppose some people are more picky about how their rules carry across every aspect of their setting. For them, the choice of system would indeed be difficult. For me, I can see a lot of different mechanics and systems still able to carry across my vision for my setting.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Wyatts last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://wyattsalazar.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/i-believe-i-can-fly-lesbo-jet-fighters-review/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I Belieeeeeve I Can Fly… (Lesbo Jet Fighters Review)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I made my setting, I basically made it with D&amp;D in mind from the start. After 3.5 proved too difficult to work with, I shifted all design intentions to entwine with D&amp;D 4e. Though I&#8217;m sure the setting could work decently enough with generic rules sets too. However, I think the choice of system and whether or not it works is something for the individual. I don&#8217;t really get it much.</p>
<p>For example, I am a big fan of abstract rules – my favorite RPGs are D&amp;D 4e, Maid: RPG and Lesbo Jet Fighters, all of which are pretty loose. I suppose some people are more picky about how their rules carry across every aspect of their setting. For them, the choice of system would indeed be difficult. For me, I can see a lot of different mechanics and systems still able to carry across my vision for my setting.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Wyatts last blog post..<a href="http://wyattsalazar.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/i-believe-i-can-fly-lesbo-jet-fighters-review/" rel="nofollow">I Belieeeeeve I Can Fly… (Lesbo Jet Fighters Review)</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Brew</title>
		<link>http://www.stargazersworld.com/2008/10/28/dungeoncraft-the-future-of-asecia/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Brew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stargazersworld.com/wordpress/?p=370#comment-374</guid>
		<description>I am going the route of using my own d20 rules for my own setting.  But beware travelling down that path, cause you might get burnt out and tired of both the setting and the rules.

I envision my setting as being written and described as system independent but with a few appendices of system specific material.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mad Brews last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madbrewlabs.com/index.php/2008/10/28/your-opinion-matters/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Your opinion matters!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going the route of using my own d20 rules for my own setting.  But beware travelling down that path, cause you might get burnt out and tired of both the setting and the rules.</p>
<p>I envision my setting as being written and described as system independent but with a few appendices of system specific material.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Mad Brews last blog post..<a href="http://www.madbrewlabs.com/index.php/2008/10/28/your-opinion-matters/" rel="nofollow">Your opinion matters!</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

